What is client 'tranching' and why is DSV using this approach?

Tranching refers to segmenting or tiering the customer base into different service groups. DSV is employing this strategy to manage the complexity of integrating two large customer portfolios post-acquisition. By categorizing clients into tiers, the company can allocate resources and standardize service delivery more systematically, though sources indicate execution remains uneven.

How long has DSV been integrating Schenker?

DSV has been working on the Schenker integration for approximately one year as of the article's publication. Industry sources indicated from the deal's close that integration would be challenging, and the slow progress suggests significant technical and operational hurdles remain unresolved.

What specific integration gaps are causing problems?

Sources cite 'sheer lack of integration' in systems and processes. This likely encompasses IT platform consolidation, operational procedure harmonization, customer data alignment, and service delivery standardization—all critical to delivering consistent service across the combined entity.

What should shippers do in response to these integration challenges?

Shippers should monitor DSV's service performance closely during this transition period. Consider diversifying carrier options, lock in favorable contract terms before synergies are fully realized, and communicate clearly with DSV about service expectations. This period may also present negotiating leverage if service disruptions occur.

What is the long-term outlook for DSV post-integration?

While near-term challenges persist, large logistics mergers typically achieve their full benefit potential within 18-36 months of close. DSV's management signaled confidence at Capital Markets Day, but supply chain professionals should expect ongoing transition impacts and may want to reassess carrier relationships within the next 6-12 months as integration stabilizes.

Shipping & Freight

High Impact

DSV Struggles with Schenker Integration Year After Merger

May 28, 2026

Get tomorrow's supply chain signal

Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

The signal

One year after the landmark DSV-Schenker acquisition, the Danish logistics giant is implementing a client segmentation strategy to manage its expanded portfolio, but industry sources report significant integration challenges that continue to hamper operational efficiency. The company disclosed at its recent Capital Markets Day that it is using a 'tranching' approach to organize its customer base, yet early indications suggest the lack of seamless system and process integration remains a substantial drag on performance.

The slow pace of integration poses a strategic risk for DSV as it attempts to consolidate market position and realize synergies from the acquisition. Supply chain professionals should note that prolonged integration friction can lead to service degradation, customer attrition, and delayed realization of cost savings—all factors that may influence carrier selection and contract negotiations in the coming quarters.

This situation underscores a broader challenge in logistics M&A: combining two large operating platforms requires far more than financial coordination; it demands technical standardization, process harmonization, and organizational alignment. For shippers, this uncertainty may create temporary opportunities to negotiate better terms or explore alternative providers while DSV stabilizes its combined operations.

#dsv-schenker-integration

#m&a-logistics

#freight-forwarding

#supply-chain-consolidation

#integration-challenges

#client-management

#carrier-operations

Frequently Asked Questions

What This Means for Your Supply Chain

Simulation Suggestion

this month

What if DSV service levels degrade 5-10% during integration?

Simulate a scenario where DSV's on-time delivery performance declines by 5-10 percentage points for 6 months due to integration disruptions, affecting both ocean and air freight lanes. Measure impact on inventory levels, safety stock requirements, and need for backup carrier capacity.

Run this scenario

Simulation Suggestion

this month

What if DSV raises rates 3-5% to offset integration costs?

Model the financial and sourcing impact of a 3-5% rate increase from DSV across major trade lanes over the next 6-12 months to fund integration investments and make up for delayed synergy realization. Compare landed costs and evaluate alternative carriers.

Run this scenario

Simulation Suggestion

strategic

What if customer churn forces DSV to compete harder on pricing?

Explore a scenario where integration challenges cause 5-8% customer attrition, prompting DSV to offer promotional rates or service credits to retain business. Assess whether this creates a narrow window for shippers to negotiate improved terms before DSV stabilizes and normalizes pricing.

Run this scenario

Get the daily supply chain briefing

Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.