Survey Reveals Critical Supply Chain Preparedness Gaps Across Industries
A new survey conducted by ERP Today reveals significant preparedness gaps in supply chain operations across multiple industries and geographies. The research identifies critical deficiencies in how organizations are planning for, monitoring, and responding to supply chain disruptions. These gaps span across ERP system capabilities, demand forecasting accuracy, supplier visibility, and business continuity planning—areas that have become increasingly essential in today's volatile operating environment. The findings underscore a troubling disconnect between the complexity of modern supply chains and organizations' actual readiness to manage them. Many companies appear to lack adequate visibility into their extended networks, struggle with real-time data integration, and have incomplete contingency plans for major disruptions. This creates compounding risk: as supply chains become more interconnected and geographically dispersed, the consequences of inadequate preparedness multiply rapidly. For supply chain professionals, this survey serves as both a warning and a call to action. Organizations that fail to address these preparedness gaps face heightened exposure to demand shocks, supplier failures, logistics disruptions, and regulatory changes. The strategic imperative is clear: investment in ERP modernization, supply chain visibility platforms, scenario planning capabilities, and cross-functional resilience programs is no longer optional but essential for competitive survival.
Supply Chain Readiness Crisis: New Survey Exposes Enterprise Vulnerability
A comprehensive survey from ERP Today has sounded an alarm bell across the supply chain industry: organizations are operating with dangerous preparedness gaps that could amplify the damage from any future disruption. The research reveals that many companies lack the visibility, systems, and planning rigor required to manage modern supply chains effectively. This matters urgently because in an environment of persistent geopolitical tension, climate volatility, and market uncertainty, preparedness is no longer a nice-to-have—it's a survival requirement.
The survey identifies critical deficiencies across multiple operational dimensions. ERP systems remain siloed and fragmented, preventing real-time data flow needed for rapid decision-making. Demand forecasting accuracy lags expectations, leaving organizations vulnerable to inventory imbalances. Supplier networks lack transparency, making it difficult to identify upstream vulnerabilities before they cascade downstream. Business continuity planning remains incomplete, with many organizations admitting they haven't stress-tested scenarios relevant to today's threat landscape.
These gaps are particularly concerning because modern supply chains are inherently fragile. They depend on precision timing, lean inventory practices, and seamless coordination across dozens or hundreds of partners. When visibility is compromised, forecasts are unreliable, or contingency plans are untested, the system becomes brittle. A single disruption—a port closure, regulatory change, supplier bankruptcy, or geopolitical event—can rapidly propagate through networks and trigger cascading failures that overwhelm unprepared organizations.
Operational Implications: What Supply Chain Leaders Must Do Now
For supply chain professionals, the survey findings translate into concrete operational imperatives. First priority: visibility infrastructure. Organizations need real-time data integration across the extended supply network—from raw materials through last-mile delivery. This means investing in supply chain control towers, IoT sensors, port data APIs, and supplier information platforms that surface risk signals early.
Second priority: demand planning sophistication. Static forecasting methods are inadequate. Teams should deploy machine learning models that incorporate multiple data streams: historical sales, social media signals, weather patterns, port congestion, supplier capacity constraints, and geopolitical indicators. Better forecasts reduce the shock when disruptions occur.
Third priority: resilience architecture. This means mapping supplier networks to redundancy levels, pre-qualifying backup suppliers for critical materials, establishing nearshoring or reshoring strategies for high-risk categories, and maintaining strategic safety stock for vulnerable items. It also means running quarterly war games and stress tests to validate business continuity plans.
Fourth priority: cross-functional governance. Supply chain risk isn't siloed to procurement or logistics. It requires executive sponsorship, CFO involvement (for capital allocation), operations accountability, and board-level transparency about key risk exposures.
The Strategic Imperative
The survey makes clear that competitive advantage in the 2020s belongs to companies with supply chain resilience embedded into operations. Those that address preparedness gaps now will be positioned to capture market share when disruptions strike, while unprepared competitors scramble to respond. Investment in ERP modernization, visibility platforms, advanced forecasting, and resilience planning isn't a cost center—it's essential infrastructure for value creation and risk mitigation.
Organizations should view this survey as a benchmark. The honest assessment: if your company exhibits the preparedness gaps described, disruption scenarios that peers might weather could prove catastrophic. The time to fix the fundamentals is now, when markets are relatively stable. Waiting until the next crisis hits is a recipe for operational disaster.
Source: ERP Today
Frequently Asked Questions
What This Means for Your Supply Chain
What if 30% of suppliers suddenly become unavailable?
Simulate an unplanned 60-day disruption affecting 30% of your supplier base across key commodity categories. Model the impact on production schedules, inventory depletion rates, and demand fulfillment under current preparedness levels.
Run this scenarioWhat if demand forecasting accuracy decreases by 25%?
Model the operational and financial impact of forecast error increasing from typical levels to 25% above baseline. Simulate effects on inventory levels, safety stock requirements, working capital, and service level targets.
Run this scenarioWhat if transportation costs increase 20% and lead times extend 2 weeks?
Simulate a combined shock: 20% increase in freight costs across all modes and 2-week extension in transit times globally. Model total cost of ownership impact, inventory carrying costs, and service level performance under reduced preparedness.
Run this scenarioGet the daily supply chain briefing
Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.