U.S. Rail Speeds Hit Multi-Year Lows as Intermodal Volume Surges
Get tomorrow's supply chain signal
Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
The signal
S. Class I railroads—BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern, and Union Pacific—are facing significant capacity constraints as shippers redirect freight to rail to escape high fuel prices and elevated trucking rates. 5%, with even more dramatic weekly increases of 12-15% in late June. However, this surge is creating a paradoxical problem: network speeds have declined to concerning levels, with CSX experiencing seven-year lows and BNSF and UP hitting 10-month lows.
The core issue is that while railroads can theoretically handle planned volume increases, the sudden and unanticipated surge is straining existing crew capacity and network infrastructure. Both Norfolk Southern and CSX are actively hiring conductors and train crews at dozens of locations to address staffing shortages. Industry analyst Rick Paterson notes this is a "trick" situation—railroads want the revenue from higher volumes, but they must protect service levels and on-time performance to retain customers. The risk is real: if railroads fail to manage this surge effectively, shippers will shift freight back to trucking once rates stabilize, eroding the revenue gains.
This situation has significant implications for supply chain professionals. Shippers who have embraced rail may experience longer transit times in the near term, even as they benefit from lower per-unit rates. Carriers relying on consistent rail service must monitor rail velocity metrics closely and consider adjusting scheduling buffers. The railroads' ability to successfully manage this volume windfall—as BNSF did in late 2023—will determine whether this capacity shift becomes permanent or temporary.
Frequently Asked Questions
What This Means for Your Supply Chain
What if intermodal train speeds remain depressed for 6 months?
Simulate a scenario where average intermodal transit times on all four Class I railroads increase by 15-20% and remain elevated through Q4 2024. Model the impact on shippers' modal mix decisions, assuming 8-12% of intermodal loads shift back to trucking when service reliability deteriorates. Include the cost impact of higher trucking rates and the loss of rail market share.
Run this scenarioWhat if crew hiring targets fall short by 30%?
Model a scenario where railroad crew hiring fails to meet targets due to labor market tightness or onboarding delays. Assume 30% shortfall in planned crew additions across all four Class I railroads by end of Q3 2024. Simulate extended dwell times, reduced train frequencies, and further velocity declines. Estimate the revenue loss from service deterioration and modal shift.
Run this scenarioWhat if trucking rates stabilize quickly, incentivizing a modal shift?
Simulate a rapid normalization of trucking rates (drop 18-22% from current peaks) within 8-10 weeks due to reduced fuel costs and seasonal demand moderation. Model shipper behavior assuming rate parity or slight trucking advantage would trigger a 25-30% reversal of recent intermodal volume gains. Calculate the revenue impact for railroads and the potential loss of hard-won capacity investments.
Run this scenarioGet the daily supply chain briefing
Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
