DAWB Rule Changes Create Liability Confusion Among Airlines

Three months following IATA's introduction of new Direct Air Waybill (DAWB) regulations, significant confusion persists within the air cargo industry regarding the practical implications of the amendments and liability allocation. Freight forwarders and airlines appear divided on interpretation, with some stakeholders unaware of potential consequences while others question whether adoption is optional or mandatory. This regulatory uncertainty creates operational and legal risk for participants across the air freight supply chain, as the absence of clear guidance on liability frameworks could expose parties to unexpected financial exposure.

The lack of alignment between IATA's intentions and industry understanding suggests inadequate communication or transition support during implementation. Major cargo operators, including Air France-KLM Cargo, are still conducting internal reviews, indicating the rules are sufficiently complex or ambiguous to warrant extended evaluation periods. This hesitation reflects broader concerns about liability reallocation—a critical issue that directly impacts pricing, contract structures, and risk management strategies for both carriers and freight intermediaries.

For supply chain professionals, this regulatory fog represents a material compliance and contracting risk. Organizations must urgently clarify their position on the new DAWB framework, audit existing air freight agreements for alignment, and establish clear internal policies on liability acceptance and insurance coverage. Failure to proactively address these ambiguities could result in disputes, delayed shipments, or denied claims during incidents.