Freight Rates Rising: Industry Vet Predicts 18-Month Rate Recovery Ahead
Track freight rate changes daily
Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
The signal
Kevin Nolan, a serial freight brokerage entrepreneur, delivered a contrarian view in a recent industry video: freight rates are not going down, and the sector is entering an early-stage recovery that could sustain for the next 18 months. His bullish assessment rests on unprecedented mid-summer contract re-rating activity and tender rejection rates that remain elevated at 14% in August—an unusual level for that time of year. These signals suggest shippers recognize they underpriced in prior cycles and are now willing to accept higher rates, marking a structural shift rather than a cyclical blip. Nolan's analysis provides critical context for brokers and shippers navigating a volatile market. The shift in contract re-rating from its typical October-November window to July is significant: it signals genuine demand for capacity and willingness to pay, not merely tactical adjustments.
Tender rejection data supports this narrative—the decline from 17% to 14% in August reflects mini-bids settling at mutually acceptable rates rather than carrier capacity softening. For the broader industry, Nolan attributes the prolonged downturn partly to undisciplined capital inflows from 2019–2024, when operators willing to operate at losses compressed margins industry-wide. The unwinding of this excess capacity is now creating conditions for sustainable rate recovery. Legal headwinds present operational and financial risks that cannot be ignored. H.
Robinson in Texas, following the Montgomery decision, has created insurance cost uncertainty and elevated litigation risk across the sector. Despite this overhang, Nolan's confidence in Robinson's market position—and his decision to increase his stock position—reflects belief in the company's ability to absorb legal costs and its dominance in a fragmented $8 trillion logistics market. For supply chain teams, Nolan's practical vetting guidance—prioritizing carrier insurance providers, factoring relationships, and tenure over FMCSA safety ratings—offers actionable risk mitigation in an environment where carrier reliability is increasingly critical.
Frequently Asked Questions
What This Means for Your Supply Chain
What if contract rates rise 8-12% over the next 18 months as Nolan predicts?
Model a scenario where freight rates increase 8-12% cumulatively over 18 months due to sustained carrier demand and ongoing capacity rationalization. Adjust transportation costs in your procurement model, recalculate landed costs by trade lane, and assess impact on mode selection (e.g., LTL vs. TL mix). Evaluate pass-through options to customers and margin compression risk if rates cannot be recovered.
Run this scenarioWhat if legal liability costs spike 20-30% due to nuclear verdicts in freight brokerage?
Model a scenario where insurance costs for freight brokers and 3PLs increase 20-30% due to elevated litigation risk following the $604M C.H. Robinson verdict and Montgomery decision. Adjust operating expense models, recalculate broker margin pressure, and assess impact on smaller brokers' viability. Evaluate whether this drives consolidation or exit among marginal players and competitive positioning of well-capitalized firms.
Run this scenarioWhat if carrier vetting criteria shift away from FMCSA ratings to insurance and factoring?
Simulate the operational impact of deprioritizing FMCSA safety ratings in carrier selection and instead weighting insurance provider quality and factoring relationships more heavily. Model potential changes in: (1) carrier rejection rates, (2) claims frequency, (3) on-time performance variability, and (4) insurance cost exposure. Assess whether this shift reduces litigation and claims risk compared to traditional safety rating methodology.
Run this scenarioGet the daily supply chain briefing
Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.