Retailers Misallocate $850B Returns Cost, Study Shows
Get tomorrow's supply chain signal
Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
The signal
An ITF Group analysis challenges how retailers account for the $849.9 billion in merchandise returns expected in 2025, arguing that many return costs actually originate from poor carrier vetting and freight handling rather than customer behavior. The report contends that retailers misclassify freight-related failures, chargebacks, and damage as customer service issues when they should be traced to procurement decisions.
With contract truckload rates reaching 52-week highs of $2.72 per mile in October, selecting low-cost carriers without evaluating total risk exposure creates hidden costs downstream. The analysis highlights a structural problem: procurement celebrates rate discounts while customer service departments absorb the resulting returns, damage claims, and chargebacks, preventing cost visibility across the organization.
Supply chain leaders must align freight selection criteria with return rate performance metrics and strengthen carrier vetting before peak season, especially after the Supreme Court's Montgomery ruling exposed liability gaps in carrier selection practices.
How this affects:
Frequently Asked Questions
What This Means for Your Supply Chain
What if retailers measure carrier impact on return rates instead of just on-time delivery?
Model a scenario where carriers are scored on return rate contribution rather than delivery timeliness alone. Compare procurement cost savings from low-cost carriers against downstream customer service and reverse logistics costs when return rates correlate with carrier selection. Show the total cost difference over peak season.
Run this scenarioWhat if a retailer reallocates 2% of returns to freight cost accounting?
Assume 2% of the $849.9 billion in 2025 returns (approximately $17 billion) are actually freight-related costs misclassified as customer returns. Model the impact on procurement budgets, carrier spending decisions, and departmental P&L alignment if these costs are reclassified to supply chain instead of customer service.
Run this scenarioWhat if truckload rates continue climbing and force retailer carrier consolidation?
Model the operational impact if contract truckload rates continue rising from the current 52-week high of $2.72 per mile. Simulate procurement pressure to consolidate carriers on fewer, lower-cost options, and calculate the downstream return rate and damage cost increases if quality vetting is sacrificed to reduce rate spend.
Run this scenarioRelated Articles
Retail's $850B Returns Crisis Stems from Freight, Not Customer Service
Oct 2, 2026
Retail Returns Crisis Reaches $849.9B as Freight Costs Soar
Oct 21, 2026
Q3 Freight Surge Squeezes Automakers, Boosts Rail Efficiency
Nov 10, 2026
Get the daily supply chain briefing
Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
