Back to Intelligence
Procurement
High Impact

Last-Mile Duopoly Breaks: 55% of Retailers Ditch FedEx/UPS

Share

Get tomorrow's supply chain signal

Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

The signal

The U.S. parcel market is undergoing a structural shift: 55% of retailers now use carriers outside the traditional FedEx, UPS, and USPS trio, with more than a third actively moving volume away from the legacy leaders. This marks a transition from carrier diversification as a cost hedge to a core operational requirement, driven by consumer expectations for 2.6-day free shipping and the growing dominance of Amazon, which handled 6.7 billion parcels in 2025 and passed USPS as the largest domestic carrier. The economics are stark: per-package costs are rising year-over-year for 83% of retailers, yet 88% of shoppers report late deliveries damage brand loyalty, putting roughly 20% of retail demand at risk.

FedEx and UPS are deliberately exiting commodity last-mile delivery to pursue higher-margin B2B logistics and premium e-commerce services, but this pivot conflicts with market reality: B2C now represents 75% of total parcel volume versus 25% for B2B. Alternative carriers including Veho, OnTrac, and Jitsu collectively grew volume 13% to 2.6 billion units, with revenue climbing 15.4%, while Amazon's flywheel (fast delivery driving density, lowering unit costs, enabling faster delivery) continues raising the service standard across the entire industry. For supply chain leaders, this shift transforms last-mile strategy from a back-office procurement exercise into a technology and reliability problem.

Retailers now require orchestration platforms to manage 4-12 carriers simultaneously, monitor performance in real time, and reroute shipments dynamically. The winners will be those who master multi-carrier networks and predictive reliability, turning delivery into a competitive advantage rather than a commodity cost center.

Frequently Asked Questions

What This Means for Your Supply Chain

Simulation Suggestion
this week

What if you commit to 2.6-day free shipping but keep all volume with FedEx/UPS?

Model the financial and operational impact of maintaining a 2.6-day free shipping commitment (now industry standard per AlixPartners data) while routing all volume through FedEx and UPS. Include the cost of peak-season surcharges (ground rates 34% above 2018 baseline), fuel surcharges (26% year-over-year growth), and potential service failures (88% of consumers report late delivery damages brand loyalty). Compare this to a diversified multi-carrier strategy.

Run this scenario
Simulation Suggestion
this month

What if your primary carrier raises rates another 6% while alternative carriers hold steady?

Simulate a scenario where your existing FedEx or UPS contract increases 6% annually (consistent with parcel industry trends cited in the article), while alternative carriers like Veho maintain current pricing through FlexSave or similar flex-window services. Model the cost impact across your full parcel volume and the service-level trade-off (slower but more predictable delivery windows) versus maintaining premium carrier services.

Run this scenario
Simulation Suggestion
strategic

What if you diversify to 4+ carriers but lack orchestration capability?

Model the operational complexity and cost impact of moving 25-40% of your parcel volume to alternative carriers (Veho, OnTrac, etc.) without implementing a carrier orchestration platform. Include the costs of manual label generation, performance tracking, and customer service inquiries due to tracking visibility gaps, versus implementing a Maersk-style multi-carrier network or third-party orchestration layer.

Run this scenario

Get the daily supply chain briefing

Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.