Shippers' 2022 Bid Playbooks Backfire in Tightening Peak Season
Get tomorrow's supply chain signal
Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
The signal
Supply chain professionals heading into peak season are discovering that the aggressive contracting tactics that worked in 2022-2024 are now counterproductive in a tightening freight market. Shippers continuing to demand long-term rate locks, steep penalties for flexibility, and minimal service collaboration are facing uncovered loads, paper rates, and higher ultimate costs as brokers push freight onto spot markets where prices spike.
Tender rejection rates have climbed to 13.9% in mid-October, compared to under 6% during peak season 2025, signaling persistent capacity constraints driven by driver enforcement actions and tightened carrier standards across the industry. Craig Lough of A.
Duie Pyle emphasizes that the market dynamic has fundamentally shifted: what worked in a falling market is now a competitive disadvantage, and shippers must pivot toward relationship-based procurement, transparent cost-plus models, and genuine collaboration with carriers and brokers rather than adversarial contracting. The article reveals a widening gap between shippers running outdated playbooks and those adapting to current market realities, with significant operational and financial consequences for those who delay adaptation.
How this affects:
Frequently Asked Questions
What This Means for Your Supply Chain
What if tender rejection rates remain above 12% through December?
Model sustained tender rejection rates of 12 to 14 percent through peak season and into January. Simulate the cascading effect on shipper load coverage, spot market pricing premiums, and the portion of freight requiring rerouting or service level degradation. Include the impact of duplicate posting strategies and late-day bid shopping.
Run this scenarioWhat if driver enforcement actions accelerate and remove 4,000 drivers per month instead of 2,700?
Project the supply chain impact of a 48 percent increase in monthly driver removals due to English-language proficiency enforcement or other compliance actions. Model the effect on carrier capacity by region, pricing premiums in enforcement-heavy areas, and shipper routing guide coverage across lanes. Include the potential for secondary carriers to exit specific geographies.
Run this scenarioWhat if shippers shift to cost-plus transparent pricing with brokers?
Simulate the impact of 30 percent of shippers adopting a transparent cost-plus model where brokers reveal carrier costs plus markup, enabling real-time market validation instead of fixed-rate negotiations. Model the effect on spot market volume, tender rejection rates, and average freight costs across LTL networks.
Run this scenarioRelated Articles
Get the daily supply chain briefing
Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
