Back to Intelligence
Risk & Disruption
High Impact

Suez Return Creates Insurance Headaches for Shippers

Share

Get tomorrow's supply chain signal

Daily supply-chain brief. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

The signal

Carriers are accelerating their return to the Suez Canal route despite ongoing security threats from Houthi attacks in the Red Sea, prompting Drewry to revise its forecast to 80% pre-diversion transit levels by February 2027. However, this creates operational complexity for shippers, particularly when carriers make ad-hoc routing decisions without advance notice, leaving BCOs scrambling to secure war-risk insurance coverage on short notice.

The economic calculus favoring Suez transit is narrower than many assume: while the route saves approximately $1 million per round voyage compared to Cape routing, war-risk insurance premiums and Suez Canal surcharges can easily erode these gains. Carriers like MSC and CMA CGM are introducing surcharges up to $91 per teu to offset additional costs, while insurance costs remain dynamic and unpredictable.

Shippers are calling for predictable, clearly advertised routing to enable effective supply chain planning and risk management.

Frequently Asked Questions

What This Means for Your Supply Chain

Simulation Suggestion
this month

What if 80% of Asia-Europe volume suddenly shifts to Suez by Q1 2025?

Model a scenario where carrier migration to Suez accelerates faster than Drewry's baseline forecast, with 80% of Asia-Europe container traffic transiting the Red Sea by Q1 2025 instead of February 2027. Account for corresponding increases in war-risk insurance costs, Suez Canal surcharges averaging $91 per teu, and potential congestion at the Suez Canal causing 2-3 day transit delays. Simulate impact on landed costs for BCOs across retail, automotive, and electronics sectors, and model required inventory policy adjustments to absorb transit time variability.

Run this scenario
Simulation Suggestion
this week

What if war-risk insurance premiums double for Suez transits?

Model a scenario where underwriter risk appetite tightens and war-risk insurance premiums climb from 0.3% of hull value to 0.6%, increasing insurance costs from $1.35 million to $2.7 million per round-voyage on a 24,000 teu ship. Combine with carrier surcharges of $91 per teu and reduced Suez Canal discounts. Calculate the breakeven analysis between Suez and Cape routing at various insurance premium levels, and model how this would shift carrier routing decisions and the costs passed through to shippers via surcharges and rate increases.

Run this scenario
Simulation Suggestion
strategic

How would a major Suez closure impact your Asia-Europe lead times?

Simulate a temporary closure of the Suez Canal lasting 2-4 weeks due to escalated geopolitical tensions or a significant incident. Model the forced rerouting of all container traffic via Cape of Good Hope, adding 10-14 days to transit times and increasing costs by approximately $1 million per round-voyage. Assess inventory buffer requirements, customer service level impacts (potential 3-4 week delivery delays to Europe), and supply chain disruption for time-sensitive industries like automotive and pharma. Calculate the financial impact of expedited air freight as a mitigation option.

Run this scenario

Get the daily supply chain briefing

Top stories, Pulse score, and disruption alerts. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.